Category: Politicorrect

It’s not as tricky as you might think. All you need to is just give the gun to the jackass and he’ll take care of it for you. Don’t believe me? Just take a look at who’s running for president of the US of A. John McCain is now officially the American President-in-waiting.

Don’t believe me? Think about it. Just how many times do you think you can call someone a son of a bitch to their face before they decide to give you the back of their hand?

Jean B. Grillo, an “over 50” writer in lower Manhattan, was pretty straightforward: “I am so tired as a white, ultra-liberal, McGovern-voting, civil-rights marching, anti-war fighting highly educated professional woman who totally supports Hillary Clinton to be attacked and vilified as racist and or dumb.”

“Many of us feel slighted,” said Lynn Eyrich Harvey, 76, from Los Gatos, Calif. “We feel that years of supporting the party is unimportant, that we are to sit down and shut up — but be sure to vote Democratic in November.”

Angry White Woman® is pissed at Obabmi and Angry White Man™ hates Billary:

Most important, the Angry White Man is pissed off. When his job site becomes flooded with illegal workers who don’t pay taxes and his wages drop like a stone, he gets righteously angry. When his job gets shipped overseas, and he has to speak to some incomprehensible idiot in India for tech support, he simmers. When Al Sharpton comes on TV, leading some rally for reparations for slavery or some such nonsense, he bites his tongue and he remembers. When a child gets charged with carrying a concealed weapon for mistakenly bringing a penknife to school, he takes note of who the local idiots are in education and law enforcement.

He also votes, and the Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him of a shovel scraping a rock.

Slice it any way that you want; it makes no damned difference at all. The Dems screwed themselves from the start.

UPDATE

Speaking of uberpissed white women… 😯 (more…)

And just what the heck is hippocrisy, you ask? Why, it’s hypocrisy the size of a hippopotamus, of course. 😛 And it can be damned amusing stuff.

Things like this remind me of Abe Lincoln. What the hell does Lincoln have to do with anything in present-day Canada? That’s easy: Lincoln once quipped that “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” I feel the same way about censorship; nothing improves my mood like seeing some totalitarian little bastard getting some of his own medicine rammed down his throat. A good example of this is one dorkette by the name of Gilary Massa. You can get a look at her here, on an episode of TVO’s The Agenda with Steve Paikin titled “Today’s Young Muslim Woman.”

What caught my attention (tip o’ the chapeau to Damian for this one) wasn’t her being a Muslim woman, however. To be honest, the first few times I read about her, the way the articles were worded, I thought she was a dude. No, what got my attention was the say she found her own guns pointed at her. Let’s start with the way that York U has stifled the debate on abortion by violating the rights of the pro-life side by banning all their groups:

Gilary Massa, vice-president external of the York Federation of Students, said student clubs will be free to discuss abortion in student space, as long as they do it “within a pro-choice realm,” and that all clubs will be investigated to ensure compliance.

“You have to recognize that a woman has a choice over her own body,” Ms. Massa said. “We think that these pro-life, these anti-choice groups, they’re sexist in nature … The way that they speak about women who decide to have abortions is demoralizing. They call them murderers, all of them do … Is this an issue of free speech? No, this is an issue of women’s rights.“

Hmm… A hijab-wearing Muslim woman who argues in favour of abortion. Didn’t see that one coming. 😯 A hijab-wearing Muslim woman who believes that the coercive power of the system should be used to shut up people she disagrees with? That’s a lot easier to picture.

Like Damian said; the minute somebody says “it’s not about free speech,” you can bet your ass it’s about free speech. And li’l Gilary obviously doesn’t like the idea of people being able to voice their opinions. Unless, of course, they happen to be her opinions; in which case, she becomes a free-speecher in one hell of a hurry!

Earlier this year, the McMaster University administration banned “anti-Zionist” organizations from using the term “Israeli Apartheid” in posters and banners on the campus. They gave their reasons, some I agree with and some I don’t. Do some digging and see for yourself.

But guess what? Massa got her bhurka all in a knot at the thought of being given a taste of her own medicine:

“We think what has happened at McMaster is an attack on freedom of speech and the right for students to be able to organize,” […] “We find it appalling that a university administration would strip students away of those fundamental rights without any consultation whatsoever. We think it sets a very scary precedent that other universities might follow.” […] “People should be allowed to have different opinions and try to convince each other and have a dialogue in a respectful manner. As student union representatives, we think that creating a safe space on campus means allowing people to use their freedom of speech, of course without being hateful or discriminatory. But they should also be able to use these words without fear of being clamped down on.”

Yeah, right. Hypocritical bitch.

Whenever I hear anyone arguing for censorship, I feel a strong impulse to see her gagged with her own hijab.

Of course, I did. And so did every other mean, nasty, homophobic, anti-multicultural, knuckle-dragging, islamophobic, intolerant, Christian, gun-totin’, pickup-drivin’, nascar-watchin’, intolerant, scaryscaryscary, rightwingrightwingrightwing, redneck neanderthal in the country.

We said that this would happen and all the “progressives” did was fling the ad hominem like a bunch of cranky caged apes with too much poop within reach. They called us every dirty name in the book and howled to the skies that “gay marriage” was not the thin edge of the wedge; it was about rights, nothing more. Well, as usual, the Fearmongering Of The Right Wing Nutjobs® has come to pass…

“Polygamy is happening in Toronto; it’s not common, but it’s happening,” said Hindy, imam at Salahuddin Islamic Centre.

Hindy, hardly a stranger to controversy, is well known for his friendship with the family of Omar Khadr, the young Canadian detainee at Guantanamo Bay, and his outspoken views on the implementation of Islamic law. In the past five years, Hindy said he has officiated or “blessed” more than 30 polygamous marriages; the most recent was two months ago. Even some imams in the GTA have second wives, he added.

“This is in our religion and nobody can force us to do anything against our religion,” he said. “If the laws of the country conflict with Islamic law, if one goes against the other, then I am going to follow Islamic law, simple as that.”

There you have it. Polygamy and another step towards the dhimmitude of Canada, all in one handy package. A two-fer. Nice, eh?

We said that this would happen. But still, the “progressives” who got us into this mess are playing dumb, pretending that they have no idea how such a thing could happen.  I mean, how could we possibly have polygamy in Canada?? Wake up, shitheads; this isn’t happening because you let it happen, it’s happening because you made it happen!

Aw, now I’m probably gonna get called an islamophobe. Hey, it’s just their culture, it’s not hurting or screwing over anybody, right? Bullshit:

…Hindy advises men to keep the second marriage a secret as long as they can, even from the first wife. There have been instances where he has gone with the men to their homes to share the news with the first wives, in an attempt to help lessen the blow.

Hindy had advised Rigby’s husband to stay quiet. When Rigby emailed Hindy, soon after discovering he had conducted the marriage, he offered little support.

“You have to stand beside him in these difficult times. You should stop causing problems to him. You will not get anything by divorce except destroying your life,” she said he told her.

Well, at least they’re not trying to ram their ideals down anybody else’s throats, right? Wrong, again (by years, this time):

A controversial Toronto imam warned Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan at a closed-door meeting to stop “terrorizing” Canadian Muslims.”If you try to cross the line I can’t guarantee what is going to happen. Our young people, we can’t control,” Aly Hindy, the head of Scarborough’s Salaheddin Islamic Centre, recalls telling the minister at the May meeting she held in Toronto with dozens of Muslim leaders.

Translation: “We’re gonna do whatever the hell we want, and if you try to get in the way, we’re gonna run amok on your asses.”

Hey, “progressives,” I got a little message for ya. You might be thinking to yourselves, in the backs of your little pea brains, “when they come for me, who will be left to speak up?“  And you know damned well that they will come for you.

The answer is that WE will be left. Mean, evil, gun-totin’ intolerant rednecks. We’ll be left because we don’t allow ourselves to be screwed with. When totalitarian assholes push us, we push back, and we aren’t afraid of escalation; we give as good as we get — usually better. And it’s not just because we have guns and know how to use them (although that’s always nice); it’s just who we are. We love our freedom, we understand that it isn’t free, and we’re willing to pay for it. No matter the price. So we’ll be the ones that are left to speak up.

Here’s the problem for you, though:

I can’t speak for everyone, so I’ll just speak for me. While I’ll be around to speak up, I won’t. Not for you. After all the damage you’ve done, I’ll be more than happy to leave you to the God damned wolves.

My kin, on the other hand, are safe. And they’re staying that way.

I like Google cache. I think it’s a totally nifty thing. You can find all kinds of interesting stuff in there. Stuff that, for some reason, isn’t where it used to be.

It makes you think, really it does. Sometimes you think “what the hell was that arsehole thinking in the first place?”

Other times, you think “why was that deleted? Is someone afraid of the Thought Police® or did they just cool off and decide that they went off half-cocked?”

I’ll let you make up your own minds on this one:

I’ve spend a pleasant day or so talking with an old friend from Toronto. We agree on some issues, disagree on others, but what’s interesting is what came up repeatedly in his comments; an issue that is for all practical purposes underground.

That issue is immigration, and specifically immigration from Jamaica.

It seems there is a general consensus in Canada’s largest city that importing the culture of baby mommas, fatherless families and gun violence from the tropics was a MISTAKE!

No one can talk about it because the Charter of Rights and Freedoms deems such talk to be illegal. And since multiculturalists think all cultures are the same, there’s no oblique way to open the subject either.

All the same, I get the impression that if the choice were offered to Torontoinians, they’d ship the bunch of them back to the Island.

Incidentally, this attitude included Somalis, Ethiopians, Eritreanians and Sudanese, who, I was told, are the source of many legal and social problems.

The feeling did not encompass other groups such as Trinidadians, Egyptians, or even Lebanese. In fact, you can say that the majority of immigrant communities to Canada are assimilating well and are welcomed.

Of course we can’t discuss groups anymore. We can’t say one group assimilates better than another. We can’t make any distinctions because our wonderful Charter doesn’t allow us to.

Not that this matters in the real world where ordinary Canadians know what the problems are, know whose causing the problems and know what they’d like to do about it.

I’d been looking for this for a day or so now and finally managed to find it on YouTube, thanks to SDAMatt (nice job, mate). Mark Steyn was on TVO’s The Agenda the other day, having a go at Mohamed Elmasry’s SP3. As you can likely imagine, ol’ Mark comes out of the gate, practically barking his head off at the end of his chain, wanting to get right to it.

I have to admit that I felt kind of sorry for Steve Paikin at several points throughout the show — the poor bugger must have felt like he was trying to herd feral cats on angel dust at some points — but overall, especially under the circumstances, I think he did rather well. The sock puppets, as you can imagine, were outdone from the start. What I can’t quite figure out, though, is Steyn. He’s nowhere near in full form in this little fracas, apparently going deliberately easy on them at some points? Maybe he just figured that they were just a bunch of kids, being used as shills — the general tone of his post-show post would seem to support this — who had no idea what they were really stirring up (which is clearly what they are, particularly the sputtering Khurrum).

At any rate, have a look and see for yourselves. The whole thing’s chopped up into six chunks of about 10 minutes each, with a little tie-up at the end. Grab a cuppa joe and enjoy… (more…)

… it seems that there are still a few things left that politicians, if they’re smart, should refrain from buggering about with. One such thing seems to be the Lord’s Prayer.

Some of you might already know that, a while back, the Christianophobic McGuintyites got it into their pointy little heads that the time had come to scrap the reading of the Lord’s Prayer at the openings of the Ontario Legislature. So, in the midst of such brainy ejaculations as “It is time to move beyond the daily recitation of the Lord’s Prayer in the Ontario Legislature to a more inclusive approach that reflects 21st century Ontario,” McGuilty and his cohorts did what Fiberals do best: they blew a bunch of my money on some dumbass plan to study the issue to death before going ahead and trying to pull off whatever damned stunt they want to, anyway. One little problem this time: things don’t seem to be going according to plan…

Speaker Steve Peters, who is heading up a committee to examine replacing the Lord’s Prayer with another reading, says thousands are giving their opinion on the divisive debate through the legislature’s website.

The traffic was so great when the committee first set up the online form that it temporarily crashed the website, prompting hundreds of calls to Peters‘ office. [That would be at 416-325-7435 in TO or 519-631-0666 (insert irony here) in St. Thomas, if you’re interested in giving this dick a piece of your mind. -D]

It’s not as if this crap hasn’t been tried before. But hey, if McGuilty thinks he can get away with it, more power to him. Anything that will rub my fellow Ontarians’ noses, good and hard, into the steaming pile of stupidity that was re-electing this asshole, can’t be all bad. How else will they learn?

Reap what you sowed, boneheads…